Reluctantly twenty. Occasionally drunk, sometimes disorderly, usually confused and increasingly incoherent.
Feb 17, 2012
Permalink

In 1981 Carl Sagan sent this letter to fellow members of The Explorers Club, “a professional society dedicated to scientific exploration of Earth, its oceans, and outer space” (Wikipedia), arguing for a change of policy to include women.

The policy was changed later that year.

Dear Fellow Member of The Explorers Club:

Thank you for the opportunity to write to you about the admission of women to The Explorers Club. The human zest for exploration and discovery is the hallmark of our species and one of the secrets of our success. It is a tradition that goes back much further than the 76 proud years in which The Explorers Club has been in existence. When our organization was formed in 1905, men were preventing women from voting and from pursuing many occupations for which they are clearly suited. In the popular mind, exploration was not what women did. Even so, women had played a significant but unheralded role in the history of exploration — in Africa in the Nineteenth Century, for example. Similarly, Lewis and Clark were covered with glory, but Sacajewea, who guided them every inch of the way, was strangely forgotten. All institutions reflect the prejudices and conventions of their times, and when it was founded The Explorers Club necessarily reflected the attitudes of 1905.

Traditions are important. They provide continuity with our past. But it is up to us to decide which traditions are essential to The Explorers Club and which are accidents of the epoch in which it was institutionalized. Times have changed since 1905. It is very clear that a foolish rigidity can destroy otherwise worthwhile institutions; they are then replaced by other organizations more in tune with the times. IBM’s recent withdrawal of corporate support for The Explorers Club because of our “exclusionary policy toward women” should be pondered carefully by every member. Many other former supporters may follow suit.

Today women are making extraordinary contributions in areas of fundamental interest to our organization. There are several women astronauts. The earliest footprints — 3.6 million years old — made by a member of the human family have been found in a volcanic ash flow in Tanzania by Mary Leakey. Trailblazing studies of the behavior of primates in the wild have been performed by dozens of young women, each spending years with a different primate species. Jane Goodall’s studies of the chimpanzee are the best known of the investigations which illuminate human origins. The undersea depth record is held by Sylvia Earle. The solar wind was first measured in situ by Marcia Neugebauer, using the Mariner 2 spacecraft. The first active volcanos beyond the Earth were discovered on the Jovian moon Io by Linda Morabito, using the Voyager 1 spacecraft. These examples of modern exploration and discovery could be multiplied a hundredfold. They are of true historical significance. If membership in The Explorers Club is restricted to men, the loss will be ours; we will only be depriving ourselves.

The supposed parallelism between our situation and those of other organizations seems to me strained. The Bohemian Club is a resort; The Explorers Club is not. The Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts are for children. Their membership derives almost exclusively from adolescent and pre-adolescent youngsters, who have not yet fully accomodated to the opposite sex. But we presumably are adults, with a special responsibility for interacting with all humans on this planet.

I do not believe that the primary function of our organization is to promote male bonding or to serve as a social club — although there is certain room for both. I believe that the fundamental dedication of the club is that stated on the masthead of every issue of The Explorers Club Newsletter: “To the conquest of the unknown and the advancement of knowledge.” If this is our purpose, then admission should be open to all qualified members of the human species.

Cordially,

Carl Sagan

(via Letters of Note)

  1. darcystarbuck reblogged this from kaleidoscopicmind
  2. qualapec reblogged this from mjolkk
  3. kenshiro28 reblogged this from mjolkk
  4. mjolkk reblogged this from trenchantashell
  5. shedsumlight reblogged this from buzzlightyearsu
  6. jesuseisenberg reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  7. ihavenoideaatall reblogged this from sweetupndown9
  8. alimeowie reblogged this from sweetupndown9
  9. sweetupndown9 reblogged this from buzzlightyearsu
  10. buzzlightyearsu reblogged this from kaiyves
  11. sampaguitablossoms reblogged this from sassybread
  12. ofrabjousmuse reblogged this from ziggystarbucks
  13. sassybread reblogged this from purplepisces15
  14. purplepisces15 reblogged this from thescienceofreality
  15. barbarawire reblogged this from bouncingdodecahedrons
  16. kaiyves reblogged this from project-argus and added:
    And this is why, someday, I will be able to become a member. (I had the chance to visit the headquarters two years ago,...
  17. the-mighty-ribozyme reblogged this from astrotastic
  18. thecandidcrow reblogged this from astrotastic
  19. dignified-and-dainty reblogged this from ofortune